Spiritual Scientist
Thursday, January 19th, 2012
I’m not particularly big on the word “religion”. I find it to be oft times restrictive, non-inclusive and all too often divisive. Though I have studied the world’s religions all my life, it’s not a field that I find myself associating with very often. When anyone asks me if I am a religious person I often answer, “not particularly, but I am a spiritual seeker.”
There’s probably no greater cause of war throughout history than religious differences. The only thing that comes close to it is greed. I choose to stay as far away from the human element of religion in my spiritual practice, which, of course, is rather impossible, but, for me, preferable. We humans (and I count myself as one) have confused the study of God, consciousness, reality, our world, matter, thought, spirit and the universe by dividing into groups and along the way, shutting doors and windows to alternative thought in an effort to protect our own.
It strikes me that religions often are more limiting than creative. They often force the thinker into a box and essentially say, “think this, study this, here is the only truth – shut the rest out.”
If there is anything that I’ve learned in my life’s study of spirituality, it’s that nobody has a corner on truth. Truth is truth. Everybody has access to it. Every religion I’ve ever studied captured and illuminated much truth for me. The only thing that really ever got in my way was the differences in language or the various definitions of words that are tossed about. Most religious differences I’ve found to be based on a confusion of semantics.
So I choose to call myself first a spiritual seeker rather than a religious person. I hope this does not offend you as I approach the writing of this post with the objective of unifying thought as opposed to dividing it.
Wikipedia states, “A scientist in a broad sense is one engaging in a systematic activity to acquire knowledge. In a more restricted sense a scientist is an individual who uses a scientific method. The person may be an expert in one or more areas of science… Some perform research toward a more comprehensive understanding of nature, including physical, mathematical and social realms… This is distinct from philosophers, those who use logic toward more comprehensive understanding of intangible aspects of reality that lack a direct connection to nature, focusing on the realm of thought itself.”
If we’re to accept these definitions put forth by Wikipedia, then I suppose I’m sort of a scientist/philosopher, a combination of both. I do engage in a “systematic activity to acquire knowledge” and also I do “use logic toward more comprehensive understanding of intangible aspects of reality…, focusing on the realm of thought itself.”
All said and done, I prefer the word “scientist”. I find spirit to be actually quite tangible the more I study it and matter to be less and less the reality. So I call myself a spiritual scientist. (more…)









